Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS IMMIGRATION - Refugee status - Well-founded fear of persecution in part of country of origin - Relocation - Reasonableness of proposed relocation Migration Act 1958 ss430, 476(1)(e), (g), (4) Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 Randhawa v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 52 FCR 437 Television Capricornia Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1986) 13 FCR 511 Western Television Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1986) 12 FCR 414 Malik v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (unreported, 4 April 1997) Muralidharan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 136 ALR 84 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu (1996) 185 CLR 259 MAQSOOD AHMAD v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS VG 424 of 1996 COURT: Sundberg J PLACE: Melbourne DATE: 20 May 1997
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No VG 424 of 1996 GENERAL DIVISION ) BETWEEN: MAQSOOD AHMAD Applicant AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS Respondent COURT: Sundberg J DATE: 20 May 1997 PLACE: Melbourne MINUTES OF ORDER The Court orders that: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's taxed costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No VG 424 of 1996 GENERAL DIVISION ) BETWEEN: MAQSOOD AHMAD Applicant AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS Respondent COURT: Sundberg J DATE: 20 May 1997 PLACE: Melbourne REASONS FOR JUDGMENT SUNDBERG J: Background The applicant is a Pakistani national. He is 48 years old and is married with five children. He arrived in Australia in September 1995 on a visitor's visa. In October 1995 he lodged an application for a protection visa with the Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs. The application was refused in November 1995. An application for review by the Refugee Review Tribunal was dismissed on 13 June 1996. The applicant seeks to review the Tribunal's decision in this Court.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate