Federal Court of Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. VG748 of 1996 ) GENERAL DIVISION )
BETWEEN: YU XIU WU Applicant AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS Respondent
CORAM: BEAUMONT, BURCHETT & GOLDBERG JJ. PLACE: SYDNEY DATED: 6 JUNE 1997
MINUTES OF ORDERS THE COURT ORDERS: 1. That in lieu of the questions stated in the special case, the following question should be answered: "Q. Should the respondent's objection to competency be upheld or overruled?" 2. That this question be answered as follows: "A. The objection should be overruled." 3. That the matter be remitted to a single Judge to be dealt with in accordance with these reasons for judgment. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. VG748 of 1996 ) GENERAL DIVISION )
BETWEEN: YU XIU WU Applicant AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS Respondent
CORAM: BEAUMONT, BURCHETT & GOLDBERG JJ. PLACE: SYDNEY DATED: 6 JUNE 1997
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT THE COURT: On 31 May 1994 the applicant applied under the Migration Act 1958 for the grant of a Class 816/818 (Special Permanent) entry permit. On 24 August 1995 that application was rejected. An application for review of that decision was made to the Migration Internal Review Office on 22 September 1995. The decision was affirmed by that Office on 13 February 1996. The applicant then applied to the Immigration Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal") for a review of that decision by application lodged on 4 March 1996. By a document headed "Immigration Review Tribunal Statement of Decision and Reasons for Decision" bearing the date 20 November 1996, the Tribunal affirmed the decision under review. The decision and reasons were sent by post to the applicant under cover of a letter dated 21 November 1996, which included the statement: "You may apply to the Federal Court of Australia for a review of this decision on one of the grounds set out in Section 476 of the Migration Act. Any such application must be made within 28 days of notification of this decision." On 17 December 1996 the applicant, acting in person, filed an application and statement of claim in this Court in respect of the decision of the Tribunal, naming as the respondent "Immigration Review Tribunal, Michelle Scott". On 17 December 1996 the Australian Government Solicitor was served with a copy of the said application and statement of claim. Then, on 18 December 1996, a notice of appearance was filed in this Court by the Australian Government Solicitor showing "Yu Xiu Wu" as applicant and "Immigration Review Tribunal, Michelle Scott" as respondent. The body of the notice stated "The Respondent herein appears". By letter dated 30 December 1996, the Australian Government Solicitor wrote to the applicant advising her, amongst other things that the proper respondent should be the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs. On 26 February 1997 the respondent filed in this Court a Notice of Objection to Competency. That Notice stated:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate