Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS COSTS - Reserved costs of motion to follow event unless Court otherwise orders - Motion by applicant for determination of separate issues prior to trial - Determination of separate issues favourably to applicant - Event - Whether determination of separate questions or of final proceeding. Rules of the Federal Court Order 62 rule 15 Trident General Insurance Co Ltd v McNiece Bros Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 107 Woods v Walsh (1989) 22 FCR 204 O'Keeffe Nominees Pty Ltd v BP Australia Ltd (1995) 128 ALR 718 Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 Baillieu Knight Frank (NSW) Pty Ltd v Ted Manny Real Estate Pty Ltd (1992) 30 NSWLR 359 Rouse v Shepherd [No 2] (1994) 35 NSWLR 277 AUSSIE AIRLINES PTY LTD v AUSTRALIAN AIRLINES LIMITED, QANTAS AIRLINES LIMITED, FEDERAL AIRPORTS CORPORATION and AUSTRALIAN AIRLINES LIMITED, QANTAS AIRLINES LIMITED v AUSSIE AIRLINES PTY LTD VG 608 of 1995 COURT: Sundberg J PLACE: Melbourne DATE: 5 June 1997
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No VG 608 of 1995 GENERAL DIVISION )
BETWEEN: AUSSIE AIRLINES PTY LTD (ACN 068 097 905) Applicant AND: AUSTRALIAN AIRLINES LIMITED (ACN 008 642 886) First Respondent AND: QANTAS AIRLINES LIMITED (ACN 009 661 901) Second Respondent
AND: FEDERAL AIRPORTS CORPORATION Third Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate