Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA LEGAL PRACTITIONERS - professional duty - solicitor's professional indemnity insurance - the concept of a solicitor's professional legal practice contrasted with entrepreneurial and promotional activities undertaken by a solicitor - ordinary functions of a solicitor - activities of a solicitor having a professional character - the solicitor/client relationship - instructions from a client - dual activities of other professionals - the giving of "purely commercial" advice - ethical responsibilities of a lawyer in relation to law-related services - professionalism and the modern solicitor - whether retainer in relation to the acquisition of a kiwi fruit orchard was a retainer within the scope of practice as solicitors - whether liability incurred in the settlement of an action for damages arose in connection with the solicitors' practice - whether marketing or promotion of investments in the area of property syndication, in conjunction with accountants seeking investment and taxation advantages for clients, part of the practice of a solicitor - negotiations of agreements for the sale and purchase of land, plant and equipment - purchase at auction - arrangement of finance for the purchase - receipt by solicitor of an acquisition fee expressed as a percentage of the purchase price - recruitment of partners in a syndicate. INSURANCE - construction of insurance policies - scope of indemnity - whether weight to be given to the statutory context, origins and rationale of a policy. PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE - indemnity for costs reasonably and necessarily incurred in proceedings arising out of a claim against the insured following settlement of the claim against the insured - application to set aside settlement - meaning of "necessarily". Mann v Hulme (1961) 106 CLR 136, distinguished Hawkins v Clayton (1988) 164 CLR 539, distinguished Hill v Van Erp (1997) 142 ALR 687, distinguished Drayton v Martin (1996) 67 FCR 1, distinguished Leary v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1980) 32 ALR 221, applied Henderson v Amadio Pty Ltd (No 1) (1995) 62 FCR 1, applied Citicorp Australia Ltd v O'Brien (1996) 40 NSWLR 398, considered Haseldine v Hosken [1933] 1 KB 822, considered Restatement of the Law Governing Lawyers, Tentative Draft No 8, March 21, 1997, Section 79, p 124 State of Florida v Sperry (1962) Fla 140 So (2d) 587, considered Sheinkopf v Stone 927 F 2d 1259, considered Law Society of NSW v Harvey [1976] 2 NSWLR 154, considered Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Snowden & Willson Proprietary Limited (1958) 99 CLR 431, applied THE SOLICITORS' LIABILITY COMMITTEE v GARRICK LEWIS GRAY and MICHAEL FREDERICK WINTER No. VG 546 of 1996 Judges: Lockhart, Beaumont, Burchett JJ. Place: Sydney (heard in Melbourne) Dated: 21 July 1997
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate