Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Administrative law - natural justice - whether the rules of natural justice were breached where the decision-maker allegedly failed to warn that it would rely on certain factual and evidentiary matters in reaching its findings - opportunity to present case - evaluating procedural fairness in the light of all the circumstances. Immigration - deportation - risk of recidivism where applicant had a long criminal history. Treaties - status in domestic law - meaning of "a primary consideration" - balance of considerations - requirement that where a decision-maker proposes to make a decision inconsistent with the legitimate expectation that an application would be dealt with in accordance with the Convention, then the person affected must be afforded procedural fairness. UN Convention on the Rights of the Child - Article 3 Migration Act 1958, ss 200-1 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act s 23B, s 39 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 - distinguished Kunz v FCT (1996) 41 ALD 533 - distinguished Amrit Lal Narain v Parnell (1986) 9 FCR 479 - distinguished Dobbie v The Secretary, Department of Social Security (1995) ASSC ¶92-137 - distinguished R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte: Venables [1997] 3 WLR 23 - considered Patel v The Minister for Immigration [1997] 1 NZLR 252 - considered
Vaitaiki v the Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Beaumont J, 20 June 1997 - applied
IMAD SALAMEH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND ETHNIC AFFAIRS
NG 889 of 1995
JUDGE: BEAUMONT
PLACE: SYDNEY
DATED: 23 JUNE 1997
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) NG 889 of 1995 ) GENERAL DIVISION )
BETWEEN: IMAD SALAMEH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate