Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA DAMAGES - Trade Practices Act 1974 - (Cth) measure of damages - mortgage insurer providing insurance relying on misleading valuation of property - valuation provided for mortgage valuation purposes - default by mortgagor - shortfall after sale of security - mortgage insurer liable to indemnify mortgagee - valuers found liable to insurer by reason of contravention of s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) - 'no-transaction case' - whether loss attributable to market fall recoverable - principles governing assessment of damages under s 82 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth). DAMAGES - breach of duty - measure of damages - mortgage insurer providing insurance relying on negligent valuation of property - valuation provided for mortgage valuation purposes - default by mortgagor - shortfall after sale of security - mortgage insurer liable to indemnify mortgagee - valuers found liable to insurer in tort - 'no-transaction case' - whether loss attributable to market fall recoverable - whether the decision of the House of Lords in Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd [1997] AC 191 should be followed - discussion of the principles governing assessment of damages for breach of duty. CAUSATION - negligent over-valuation of property - mortgage insurer relying on valuation in providing mortgage insurance - whether loss due to market fall attributable to negligence of valuers - test to be applied. Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 52, 82. Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) ss 42, 68. MGICA (1992) Ltd (formerly MGICA Ltd) v Kenny & Good Pty Ltd (1996) 140 ALR 313, upheld. Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd [1997] AC 191, not followed. Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd [1995] QB 375, discussed. Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Co (1880) 5 App Cas 25, cited. Caparo Industries Pty Ltd v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605, distinguished. Doyle v Olby (Ironmongers) Ltd [1969] 2 QB 158, cited. Chandler v Crane Christmas & Co [1951] 2 KB 164, cited. Esanda Finance Corporation v Peat Marwick Hungerfords (1997) 142 ALR 750, cited. March v E & M H Stramare Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506, cited. Gates v City Mutual Life Assurance Society Limited (1986) 160 CLR 1, cited. L Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (No 1) (1981) 150 CLR 225, applied. South Australia v Johnson (1982) 42 ALR 161, cited. Gould v Vaggelas (1984) 157 CLR 215, cited. Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co (The Wagon Mound) [1961] AC 388, cited. Richards v Victoria [1969] VR 136, cited. Hill (t/as RF Hill & Associates) v Van Erp (1997) 142 ALR 687, cited. Medlin v State Government Insurance Commission (1995) 182 CLR 1, cited. Chapman v Hearse (1961) 106 CLR 112, cited. Faulkner v Keffalinos (1970) 45 ALJR 80, cited. Wardley Australia Ltd v State of Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514, applied. Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL (1994) 179 CLR 332, cited. Kizbeau Pty Ltd v W G & B Pty Ltd (1995) 184 CLR 281, cited. Potts v Miller (1940) 64 CLR 282, discussed/distinguished. Smith v New Court Securities Ltd v Citibank NA [1997] AC 254, cited. Toteff v Antonas (1952) 87 CLR 647, cited. Copping v ANZ McCaughan Ltd (Full Court of S Ct/SA, 21 March 1997, unreported), discussed/cited. KENNY & GOOD PTY LIMITED & ANOR v MGICA (1992) LIMITED NG 814 of 1996 Wilcox, Branson & Sackville JJ Sydney 8 August 1997
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate