Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Medical practitioners - Excessive services - Appeal from decision of Medical Services Review Tribunal - Whether it was necessary to find that the medical practitioner knew or was recklessly unconcerned whether the services were reasonably necessary - Meaning of "personal fault" - Whether clear intention to override the fundamental principle that a guilty mind is required before a person can be held responsible for criminal or quasi-criminal conduct - Onus of proof - Nature of Tribunal proceeding - Whether onus of proof applies to administrative tribunals - Estoppel - Effect of notice that previous statement no longer applied - Whether estoppel operates to prevent exercise of discretion
Health Insurance Act 1973 ss 79(1B), 105, 106AA, 106AB, 124A, 129 Tiong & Anor v Minister for Community Services & Health (1990) 93 ALR 308 Minister for Health v Peverill (1991) 29 FCR 262 Peverill v Backstrom & Ors (1994) 54 FCR 410 The Queen v O'Connor (1980) 146 CLR 64 Coco v The Queen (1994) 179 CLR 427 Minister for Health v Thomson (1985) 8 FCR 213 McDonald v Director-General of Social Security (1984) 1 FCR 354 Taylor v Minister of State for Health (1989) 23 FCR 53 Minister for Immigration v Polat (1995) 57 FCR 98 BUTLER v FOURTH MEDICAL SERVICES REVIEW TRIBUNAL & Anor VG 494 of 1996 Before: NORTH J Place:MELBOURNE Date: 15 AUGUST 1997
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY ) VG 494 of 1996 ) GENERAL DIVISION )
BETWEEN: Dr BERNARD STEWART BUTLER
Applicant
AND: FOURTH MEDICAL SERVICES REVIEW TRIBUNAL
First Respondent
THE MINISTER FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate