Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA INTERNATIONAL TAXATION - whether Netherlands company liable to income tax under s 25(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) on profits from the sale of shares in an Australian company - whether those profits fall within Art 13 (alienation of property) of the Netherlands-Australia Double Taxation Agreement such that they are excluded from Art 7 (business profits) of that Agreement - consideration of the legislative history of and proper interpretation to be given to Art 13. Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), ss 25(1), 160ZO(1) and Part IVA International Tax Agreements Act 1953 (Cth), ss 4, Schedules 10 and 10A Stamp Duties Act 1920 (NSW), Div 30 Immigration Act 1958 (Cth) Allstate Life Insurance Co v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No 6) (1996) 64 FCR 79, applied Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1977) 71 ALJR 381, considered Thiel v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1990) 171 CLR 338, applied Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 297, referred to In re Hoyles [1911] 1 Ch 179, distinguished R v Williams [1942] AC 541, distinguished Brassard v Smith [1925] AC 371, distinguished Gramophone and Typewriter Ltd v Stanley [1908] 2 KB 89, considered COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v LAMESA HOLDINGS BV NG 225 of 1997 BURCHETT, HILL & EMMETT JJ SYDNEY 20 August 1997
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. NG 225 of 1997
GENERAL DIVISION )
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA BETWEEN: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION Appellant AND: LAMESA HOLDINGS BV Respondent
JUDGES: BURCHETT, HILL & EMMETT JJ PLACE: SYDNEY DATED: 20 August 1997
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate