Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA MIGRATION - Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 476 - Schedule 2 of the Migration (1993) Regulations - whether applicant held a substantive visa at date of application for General (Residence) visa. Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 48, 476 Migration (1993) Regulations, reg 2.29 (1C), cll 830.52, 830.71 of Schedule 2 Migration Reform (Transitional Provisions) Regulations, regs 10, 23 Esteron v The Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1995) 57 FCR 126, distinguished FRANCISCO BAGANG v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS NG 59 of 1997 BRANSON J SYDNEY 20 AUGUST 1997
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) NG 59 of 1997 ) GENERAL DIVISION )
BETWEEN: FRANCISCO BAGANG
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION
AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: BRANSON J PLACE: SYDNEY DATED: 20 AUGUST 1997
MINUTES OF ORDER
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The decision of the respondent is affirmed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) NG 59 of 1997 ) GENERAL DIVISION )
BETWEEN: FRANCISCO BAGANG
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION
AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: BRANSON J PLACE: SYDNEY DATED: 20 AUGUST 1997
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
APPLICATION
This is an application pursuant to s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("the Act") for the review by this Court of a decision of the respondent made under the Act relating to visas. It was not in dispute that the decision of the respondent, which was not a decision made by him personally, is a "judicially reviewable decision" within the meaning of s 476 of the Act (see s 475(1)(c)).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate