Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA IMMIGRATION - entry permits - requirement of work experience or trade qualification - applicant employed as a storeman - whether applicant's occupation a "trade" - whether definition of "trade" should be narrowed by definition of "trade certificate" - requirement of Australian education and training standards - procedures to be followed in assessing whether the applicant's occupation satisfies the requirements of the Migration (1993) Regulations (Cth) reg 816.721(2)(b)(ii). WORDS AND PHRASES - "trade" - "work experience" - "education and training standards" - Migration (1993) Regulations (Cth). Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 476(1)(a),(e). Migration 1993 Regulations (Cth), reg 816.72.
Kumar v Immigration Review Tribunal (1992) 36 FCR 544, considered. Mak v Immigration Review Tribunal (1994) 48 FCR 314, cited. Morales v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1995) 60 FCR 550, cited. Pillay v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (FCA/Tamberlin J, 29 July 1997, unreported), followed. Tanchiatco v Minister for State for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (FCA/Branson J, 20 August 1997, unreported), followed. Subraju v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 68 FCR 313, not followed.
ENAYETUR RAHIM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND ETHNIC AFFAIRS NG 708 of 1996 SACKVILLE J 28 AUGUST 1997 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ) ) NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) NG 708 of 1996 ) GENERAL DIVISION )
BETWEEN: ENAYETUR RAHIM
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND ETHNIC AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE(S): SACKVILLE J. PLACE: SYDNEY DATED: 28 AUGUST 1997
MINUTES OF ORDER
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The decision of the Immigration Review Tribunal, made on 16 August 1996, be affirmed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate