Federal Court of Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 706 of 1997
BETWEEN: FARAH (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS NEW SOUTH WALES BRANCH
FIRST RESPONDENT
JOHN IVANCIC
SECOND Respondent
GREG KELLY
THIRD RESPONDENT
PETER ROBERTS
FOURTH RESPONDENT
RITA BAPTISTA
FIFTH RESPONDENT
DANIEL RINGIS
SIXTH RESPONDENT
DARREN AMBLER
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
KELLY ENOKA
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
BRENDON BOLAND
NINTH RESPONDENT
VERNARD TAYLOR
TENTH RESPONDENT
ROSS AGATI
ELEVENTH RESPONDENT
AARON RE
TWELFTH RESPONDENT
ANNA WILLIAMS
THIRTEENTH RESPONDENT
ANTHONY ATKINSON
FOURTEENTH RESPONDENT
MARK WILSON
FIFTEENTH RESPONDENT
LUCY FULLER
SIXTEENTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE(S): SACKVILLE J.
DATE OF ORDER: 15 SEPTEMBER, 1997
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for an interlocutory injunction be dismissed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 706 of 1997
BETWEEN: FARAH (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS NEW SOUTH WALES BRANCH
FIRST Respondent
JOHN IVANCIC
SECOND Respondent
GREG KELLY
THIRD RESPONDENT
PETER ROBERTS
FOURTH RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate