Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA MIGRATION - review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal - whether Tribunal erred in law - persecution need not be "constant and unremitting" - whether applicant was unable or unwilling to avail himself to the protection of France as a French national - proper approach to "protection issue" under Convention - relevance of degree of efficacy of protection in country of nationality Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 476(1)(e)
Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379, applied Koe v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 143 ALR 695, applied Lal v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (Madgwick J, 4 September 1996, unreported), considered Ram v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1995) 130 ALR 314, considered Randhawa v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 124 ALR 265, applied Yesus v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (Madgwick J, 9 July 1996, unreported), considered
James Hathaway, The Law of Refugee Status, Butterworths, 1991, disapproved PRATHAPAN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS NG 236 of 1997 Madgwick J Sydney 5 September 1997
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 236 of 1997
BETWEEN: Nagaratnam Prathapan
Applicant
AND: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
Respondent
JUDGE(S): MADGWICK J
DATE OF ORDER: 5 SEPTEMBER 1997
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The Refugee Review Tribunal's decision be set aside. 2. The matter be remitted to the said Tribunal for rehearing according to law. 3. The respondent is to pay the applicant's costs.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 236 of 1997
BETWEEN: Nagaratnam Prathapan
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate