Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA IMMIGRATION - application for protection visa refused - whether Tribunal acted according to substantial justice in refusing to adjourn the hearing - whether Tribunal acted according to substantial justice when it received interpretations of the applicant's evidence in narrative form - whether Tribunal correctly relied upon the "relocation" principle.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth): ss 420, 476
Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1990) 169 CLR 379 Randhawa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 52 FCR 437 Eshetu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, 10 July 1997, unreported, Davies, Burchett and Whitlam JJ Khan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, 4 August 1997, unreported, Lockhart J
LYDIA RARA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND ETHNIC AFFAIRS and JILL TOOHEY, SITTING AS THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NG 892 of 1995
LOCKHART J 9 SEPTEMBER 1997 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 892 of 1995
BETWEEN: LYDIA RARA
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND ETHNIC AFFAIRS
First Respondent
JILL TOOHEY, sitting as the REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: LOCKHART J
DATE OF ORDER: 9 september 1997
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application is dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 892 of 1995
BETWEEN: LYDIA RARA
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND ETHNIC AFFAIRS
First Respondent
JILL TOOHEY, sitting as the REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate