Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Migration - Application for permanent visa under Business Migration Program refused by delegate - Application for review successful on one ground only - Matter remitted to delegate for reconsideration - Application again refused - Application for review on grounds rejected on earlier review - Whether abuse of process - Refusal preceded by report recommending refusal - Delegate accepted recommendation - Whether to be inferred that delegate's reasons those contained in report - Natural justice - Decision based on information about applicant's criminal connections contained in confidential reports - Reports privileged from disclosure - Whether summary of information sufficient to draw applicant's attention to case against him - Inspection of reports by court - Bias - Reasonable apprehension - Application to administrative decisions. Migration Regulations 1989 reg 4(1)(a)(iii) and (b) Chu v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 45 FCR 540 Chu Sing Wun v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (Branson J, 11 April 1995, unreported) Chu Sing Wun v Minister for Immigration (1995) 39 ALD 328 Mann v Mann (1957) 97 CLR 433 Irving v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1995) 38 ALD 529 Citibank Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 88 ATC 4,714 Surinakova v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1991) 33 FCR 87 Plattara v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1991) 29 ALD 469 Ju Shang Zia v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1991) 27 ALD 668 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 Rogers v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 251 Roser v Immigration Review Tribunal [No 2] (1992) 29 ALD 182 Lessur - Millar (1990) 47 A Crim R 111 Hunter v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [1982] AC 529 Air Canada v Secretary of State for Trade [1983] 2 AC 394 Alister v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 404 Burmah Oil Co Ltd v Bank of England [1980] AC 1090 Sankey v Whitlam (1978) 142 CLR 1 Church of Scientology of California v Department of Health & Social Security [1979] 1 WLR 723 Reg v Gaming Board; Ex parte Benaim [1970] 2 QB 417 Minister for Immigration v Kurtovic (1990) 21 FCR 193 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko‑Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Li Shi Ping v Minister for Immigration (1994) 35 ALD 225 Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1990) 170 CLR 70 Re Media, Entertainment & Arts Alliance; Ex parte Hoyts Corporation Pty Ltd (1994) 68 ALJR 179 Century Metals and Mining NL v Yeomans (1989) 100 ALR 383 Webb v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 41 Minister for Immigration v Mok (1994) 55 FCR 375 Reg v Watson; Ex parte Armstrong (1976) 136 CLR 248 Huluba v Minister for Immigration (1995) 59 FCR 518 Gascor v Ellicott [1997] 1 VR 332 Re JRL; Ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342 Chan v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1991) 31 FCR 565 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 Lloyd v Costigan (1983) 62 ALR 284 Nestle Australia Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 10 FCR 78 Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 CHU SING WUN v THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND ETHNIC AFFAIRS WAG 32 of 1997 CARR, KIEFEL & SUNDBERG JJ PERTH 19 SEPTEMBER 1997
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate