Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAl COURT OF AUSTRALIA Administrative law - judicial review - nursing homes - government contracts - whether or not an officer of the Department of Health entered into an agreement with a health care group concerning a compromise of an amount to be recovered by reason of an overpayment of Commonwealth benefit payable in respect of nursing home patients in nursing homes - the effect of such compromise, if any - the status in administrative law of the law regarding compromise - whether there had been a change of ownership in nursing homes - existence of an alternative remedy in the form of an avenue for statutory merits review. Estoppel - whether the Secretary of the Department of Health can be estopped from exercising a statutory discretion. Practice and procedure - whether appropriate for a question to be set aside for separate determination - form of the question to be set. Trade practices - whether the administration of the system for the payment to nursing home proprietors is a business carried on by the Commonwealth for the purposes of s 2A of the Trade Practices Act 1974. National Health Act 1953 - Parts VA and VD Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 - s 10 Trade Practices Act 1974 - s 2A Federal Court Rules - O 20 r 2 Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1 - cit. Minister for Immigration v Petrovski Burchett, O'Loughlin and Tamberlin JJ, 12 March 1997, unreported - cit. Yango Pastoral Co Pty Limited v First Chicago Australia Limited (1978) 139 CLR 410 - cons. Federal Airports Corporation v Aerolineas Argentinas Beaumont, Whitlam and Lehane JJ, 1 August 1997, unreported - cit. Commissioner of State Revenue (Victoria) v Royal Insurance Australia Limited (1994) 182 CLR 51 -cons. R v Home Secretary; Ex parte Pierson [1997] 3 WLR 492 - cons. General Newspapers Pty Limited v Telstra Corporation (1993) 117 ALR 629 -app. Commonwealth of Australia v Mewett (1997) 146 ALR 299 - cited Pullen v Ready (1743) 2 Atk 587 - cons. F J Hospital Enterprises Pty Limited v Grimes & Rose (1987) 12 ALD 224 - dist. MORAN HOSPITALS PTY LIMITED v CONOR KING and PAUL HUNTLEY NG 412 of 1997 JUDGE: BEAUMONT J PLACE: SYDNEY DATE: 3 SEPTEMBER 1997
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate