Federal Court of Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 841 of 1995
BETWEEN: MOGAP PTY LIMITED & ORS
Applicant
AND: MOBIL OIL AUSTRALIA LIMITED
Respondent
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE: 26 SEPTEMBER 1997
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (Ex-tempore Judgment) I have before me a notice of motion in relation to three matters, JTP Holdings Pty Ltd, Benauto Pty Ltd and Roseville Self Serve Station Pty Ltd concerning interlocutory orders pending further order of the Court. These matters are presently under appeal to the Full Court of this Court. The appeal has been heard and judgment reserved. In relation to two of the matters, JTP Holdings Pty Ltd and Roseville Self Serve Station Pty Ltd, it seems to me that it is appropriate that an undertaking as to damages should be proffered as a condition of granting the orders because they involve instances where there was a 1 for 1 case advanced which was not accepted by Mr Justice Wilcox, the primary judge. The third matter, namely BenautoPty Ltd, concerns an allegation that there is a 9 for 6 arrangement and in those circumstances I consider that I ought to follow the approach taken by Mr Justice Wilcox and proceed consistently with the interlocutory order that he made not to exact an undertaking as to damages. I appreciate there are some distinctions between circumstances inBenauto and the present case as determined by his Honour in relation to the 9 for 6, but I think on balance Benauto presents a situation where there need not be an undertaking as to damages.
Accordingly I propose to make short minutes of order as sought in each of the other two matters. In the case of Benauto, I do not consider that an undertaking as to damages is appropriate. I grant liberty to apply to all the parties on two days notice to the Court in relation to these matters. So far as costs are concerned, I order that the costs be costs in the cause. I certify that this and the preceding one (1) page is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Tamberlin
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate