Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA CONVEYANCING - Relationship of Vendor and Purchaser - Land Titles under the Torrens System - Caveats against Dealings - purchaser-caveator agrees to vendor company's subsequently selling to associated company of purchaser's at reduced price, upon purchaser's being paid amount out of proceeds of second sale upon completion of it - in reliance, vendor company enters into unconditional contract to sell to the associated company of original purchaser - vendor company goes into liquidation - original purchaser lodges caveat which prevents vendor company in liquidation from completing second contract - vendor company in liquidation and its liquidator seek removal of caveat - cooperation between original and later purchasers - original purchaser refraining from seeking specific performance but maintaining caveat - stance taken by original purchaser in encouraging vendor to effect second sale inconsistent with original purchaser's obtaining specific performance - prospect of original purchaser's obtaining specific performance measure of the "equitable estate as purchaser" claimed by it in caveat - trial Judge's order for removal of caveat sustained. CONTRACT - Construction - special condition in contract for the sale of land acknowledging that deposit paid. In fact, to knowledge of both parties, deposit not paid - whether true effect that purchaser subject to ongoing obligation to pay deposit - construction that true effect that purchaser to be treated on completion as having paid amount of deposit. CORPORATIONS - Winding up - voidable transactions - contract for sale of land for $180,000 - that price equal to value of property but special condition that "deposit" of $120,000 paid which had not in fact been paid (associated company of vendor company owed $120,000 to purchaser and lacked means to pay) - subsequently vendor and purchaser execute deed of rescission - context is that purchaser facilitating sale of same property to a company loosely associated with it for only some $135,000 - rescission of original agreement to be effective only upon payment of $120,000 to original purchaser out of proceeds of the sale to second purchaser - contemporaneously with deed of rescission vendor enters into contract to sell to second purchaser - vendor subsequently, but before completing second contract of sale, wound up - vendor solvent at time of original contract but insolvent by time of deed of rescission and second contract of sale, insolvent - whether original contract an "uncommercial transaction" and an "insolvent transaction within ss 588FB and 588FC of Corporations Law - whether deed of rescission made "for purpose of giving effect to" the transaction embodied in original agreement. Corporations Law ss 588FB, 588 FC DEMONDRILLE NOMINEES PTY LIMITED v KEVIN R SHIRLAW AND CORNELIS HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) KEVIN R SHIRLAW v CORNELIS HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) AND DEMONDRILLE NOMINEES PTY LIMITED AG 52 of 1997 FOSTER, LINDGREN AND MADGWICK JJ SYDNEY (HEARD IN CANBERRA) 13 NOVEMBER 1997
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate