Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA AVIATION LAW - Civil liability claim - Claim for psychological injuries suffered by passengers and non-passengers following the ditching of an aeroplane - Claims made after expiration of two years and in reliance on causes of action other than liability under the Civil Aviation (Carriers' Liability) Act - Whether claims precluded by that Act. Civil Aviation (Carriers' Liability) Act 1959 Federal Court Rules, Order 20 rule 2
NG194 of 1997
kenneth magnus v SOUTH PACIFIC AIR MOTIVE PTY LTD, GROUP AIR PTY LTD, CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY and airservices australia
JUDGE: WILCOX J
PLACE: SYDNEY
DATE: 27 NOVEMBER 1997
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG194 of 1997
BETWEEN: KENNETH MAGNUS
Applicant
AND: SOUTH PACIFIC AIR MOTIVE PTY LTD
First Respondent
GROUP AIR PTY LTD
Second Respondent
CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
Third Respondent
and
AIRSERVICES AUSTRALIA
Fourth Respondent
JUDGE: WILCOX J
DATE: 27 NOVEMBER 1997
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The proceeding be dismissed as against South Pacific Air Motive Pty Ltd and Group Air Pty Ltd to the extent that it claims on behalf of the applicant or any group member relief in relation to any physical injury sustained by that person, including psychological damage sustained by that person as a result of that physical injury. 2. Otherwise the Notice of Motion of South Pacific Air Motive Pty Ltd and Group Air Pty Ltd dated 31 July 1997 be dismissed. 3. South Pacific Air Motive Pty Ltd and Group Air Pty Ltd pay to Kenneth Magnus 90% of the costs incurred by him in respect of the said motion. 4. The principal proceeding stand over for a further directions hearing at 9.30am on 12 December 1997. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate