Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA DISCRIMINATION LAW - indirect discrimination in employment on ground of sex- representative action by national union on behalf of group of Western Australian members - women on extended leave from bank for reasons connected with child birth and child care, during period of corporate restructuring - group denied opportunity to express interest in voluntary retrenchment available to other employees - group subject to disadvantageous conditions with respect to applying for new positions which became available by reason of the restructure -construction and application of s 5(2)(b) Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) - factors to be taken into account when determining whether employment requirement constitutes discrimination - whether conditions imposed by the bank reasonable in all the circumstances - onus of proof - whether failure to consider effect of entitlements associated with extended leave, including guarantee of comparable job on return - selection of appropriate base group for determining proportionate ability to comply with conditions imposed. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review - review of decision of Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission - finding that claim of indirect discrimination contrary to the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) was substantiated - no determination as to appropriate relief - whether reviewable decision. Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), ss 5(1)(e), 5(1)(f). Sex Discrimination Act 1984 - 1994 (Cth), ss 3, 5, 14(2), 40(1)(e), 50, 69, 81. Commonwealth v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1997) EOC 92-890, cited. Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd v Banovic (1989) 168 CLR 165, cited. Australian Medical Council v Wilson (1996) 68 FCR 46, cited. Waters v Public Transport Corporation (1991) 173 CLR 349, applied. Secretary, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade v Styles (1989) 23 FCR 251, discussed and applied. Commonwealth v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1995) 63 FCR 74, cited. IW v City of Perth (1997) 146 ALR 696, cited. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259, cited. State Electricity Commission of Victoria v Casey [1994] 2 VR 216, discussed and applied. Northern NSW FM Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1990) 26 FCR 39, cited. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990)170 CLR 321, distinguished. COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA v HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION & ANOR NG 306 OF 1997
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate