Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - application for leave to file cross-claim - whether leave should be granted
ann hopkins v seymour softwoods limited, sintoff pty limited, berrema finance pty limited and equuscorp pty limited (formerly called equus financial services limited)
NG 3039 of 1996
FOSTER J 26 NOVEMBER 1997 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 3039 of 1996
BETWEEN: ann hopkins
Applicant/cross respondent
AND: seymour softwoods limited
(Controller Appointed) (acn 007 055 889)
First Respondent/cross claimant
sintoff pty limited
(Receiver Appointed) (acn 006 621 487)
Second Respondent/cross claimant
berrema finance pty limited
(Receiver Appointed) (acn 005 982 605)
Third Respondent/cross claimant
equuscorp pty limited (formerly called equus financial services limited) (acn 006 012 344)
Fourth Respondent
JUDGE: FOSTER J
DATE OF ORDER: 26 NOVEMBER 1997
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS and directs THAT: 1. The first, second and third respondents have leave to file a cross-claim in the form of the document entitled 'cross claim' and marked with the letter 'A' and placed with the papers except for paragraphs sixteen, seventeen and twenty-one of the cross-claim, in respect of which leave is refused. 2. There be no further evidence in respect of the issues raised by the cross-claim other than with leave of the Court, such leave to be sought by 17 December 1997. 3. By 17 December 1997 the applicant form a view as to whether the cross-claim raises significant difficulties as regards the preparation of its reply to cross-claim in relation to the matters identified in para 2(vi) of the schedule to the letter dated 24 November 1997 which is Exhibit A in this motion. The applicant has leave to apply to the Court to rescind the granting of leave to file the cross-claim, if such a view is formed. 4. The first, second and third respondents provide $10,000 security for costs incurred by the applicant in relation to the cross-claim within twenty-one days. 5. The applicant has leave to seek a direction precluding the first, second and third respondents from claiming that the cross-claim was commenced earlier than the filing of the notice of motion seeking leave to file the cross-claim. 6. The first, second and third respondents pay the applicant's costs of this motion. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate