Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA MIGRATION - Refugee status - review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal ("RRT") that it was not satisfied that applicant is a refugee - findings on credibility - fact finding in refugee cases - application of principles from Chan - relevance of findings on past facts to findings as to future - whether RRT required to consider whether its findings as to past and future events might be wrong - whether finding required to be made as to existence of applicants' subjective fear - whether any failure of RRT to act according to substantial justice and the merits of the case as required by s 420 of the Migration Act 1958 - 'internal relocation' - whether relocation reasonable and availability of protection meaningful ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - whether actual bias on part of RRT - whether constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction - whether findings on credibility in a decision as to satisfaction are reviewable as an error of law. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 866.221 Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees New York Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees Guo v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 64 FCR 151 considered Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989)169 CLR 379 applied Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 applied Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 144 ALR 567 applied Thambythurai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (Federal Court of Australia, Finkelstein J, 16 September 1997, unreported) considered Eshetu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 145 ALR 621 considered Li v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 144 ALR 179 considered Noble v Repatriation Commission (Full Court of the Federal Court, 3 November 1997, unreported) applied Ex parte Hebburn Ltd; Re Kearsley Shire Council (1947) SR (NSW) 416 considered Sinclair v Maryborough Mining Warden (1975) 132 CLR 473 considered Randhawa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 124 ALR 265 applied ERIC EMIANTOR v THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS VG721 of 1996
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate