Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA PROCEDURE - stay - application to stay hearing of proceedings for discharge from bankruptcy - application to be joined as party to Administrative Appeals Tribunal proceedings previously refused - appeal to Federal Court dismissed - appeal to Full Federal Court dismissed - new joinder application - judgment against bankrupts in Supreme Court of Western Australia - initial refusal to list joinder application but subsequently listed - proximity of hearing of joinder application to substantive hearing - whether reasonable apprehension of bias EQUITY - interlocutory relief - whether serious question to be tried - balance of convenience - whether reasonable apprehension of bias - whether merit of conduct of party to Administrative Appeals Tribunal relevant.
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Khadem v Barbour, Senior Member of the AAT (Hill J, Federal Court of Australia, 30 August 1995 unreported) referred to Lord v Spinelly (1991) 4 WAR 158 referred to Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 applied Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1990) 170 CLR 70 referred to Re Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance; Ex parte Hoyts Corporation Pty Ltd (1994) 68 ALJR 179 referred to
PETER MICHAEL MELSOM & Ors v B M FORREST, DEPUTY PRESIDENT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL & Ors
wag 145 of 1997
R D NICHOLSON J PERTH 28 NOVEMBER 1997
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WG 145 of 1997
BETWEEN: PETER MICHAEL MELSOM and STANLEY FREDERIC ROBSON
Applicants
AND: B M FORREST, DEPUTY PRESIDENT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
First Respondent
MARIE SPINELLY and JACQUES SPINELLY
Second Respondents
INSPECTOR-GENERAL IN BANKRUPTCY
Third Respondent
JUDGE: R D NICHOLSON J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate