Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
practice & procedure - whether mediation should be ordered where a party does not consent - whether mediation would be expeditious or effective.
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, s 53A(1), s 53A(1A)
Federal Court Rules, O 72 r 8, O 72 r 7(1)(a), O 72 r 2(2), O 10 r 1(2)(h)
KILTHISTLE NO.6 PTY LIMITED (RECEIVER AND MANAGER APPOINTED) and AMMRAD PTY LIMITED T/AS LLOYDS TRANSPORTABLE HOMES and BETTER LOOK HOMES PTY LIMITED v AUSTWIDE HOMES PTY LIMITED and CARINDALE HOMES PTY LIMITED and MICHAEL STANLEY NEASON and JOHN AUSTIN FLEMING and PHILLIP MALCOLM ANDREA and BRADLEY JOHN WILSON and STEPHEN JAMES FILEWOOD and KERRY DAVID PASCOE and JAMES DAVID PASCOE and DIANNE MARGARET PASCOE and AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES COMMISSION and AV WEHL INDUSTRIES LIMITED and ACI AUSTRALIA LIMITED
NG 9 of 1996
lehane J
10 DECEMBER 1997
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 9 of 1996
BETWEEN: KILTHISTLE NO.6 PTY LIMITED
(RECEIVER AND MANAGER APPOINTED)
First Applicant
AMMRAD PTY LIMITED T/AS LLOYDS TRANSPORTABLE HOMES
Second Applicant
BETTER LOOK HOMES PTY LIMITED
Third Applicant
AND: AUSTWIDE HOMES PTY LIMITED
First Respondent
CARINDALE HOMES PTY LIMITED
Second Respondent
MICHAEL STANLEY NEASON
Third Respondent
JOHN AUSTIN FLEMING
Fourth Respondent
PHILLIP MALCOLM ANDREA
Fifth Respondent
BRADLEY JOHN WILSON
Sixth Respondent
STEPHEN JAMES FILEWOOD
Seventh Respondent
KERRY DAVID PASCOE
Eight Respondent
JAMES DAVID PASCOE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate