Federal Court of Australia
JUDGMENT No. IESE, 78
00 vececesteoeel evoeceencece
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WG 155 of 1997 BETWEEN: ERIC JOSEPH SCHAEFER
APPLICANT AND: ; LLOYD GUTHREY.... ..-
CHAIRMAN STATE HOUSING COMMISSION
RESPONDENT JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J DATE: 26 NOVEMBER 1998 PLACE: PERTH
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Ex-tempore judgment
In this matter, I have considered the submissions which have been advanced by both parties. I have paid particular attention to those advanced by Mr Schaefer in respect of this application for review under section 18AC of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) of the decision of Judicial Registrar Farrell of 22 May 1998.
I am satisfied that the application as brought by Mr Schaefer does not disclose any reasonable cause of action and I am not, therefore, persuaded that there has been any reviewable error committed by the judicial registrar in the reasons for decision, which were under contest this
afternoon. Accordingly I dismiss the application for review.
I certify that this and the preceding pages are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Tamberlin
Z FIVE Associate: LEE RE , aN we
: FEDERAL COUR! OF Dated: 26 November 1998 AUSTRALIA
PRINCIPAL REGISTRY
The Applicant:
Counsel for the Respondent:
Solicitor for the Respondent:
Date of Hearing:
Date of Judgment:
Applicant appeared in person Mr R E Cock QC
Australian Government Solicitor 26 November 1998
26 November 1998
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate