Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ELECTIONS - Constitutional Convention - petition disputing election - whether successful candidates took part in conduct of election - whether successful candidates committed or attempted to commit undue influence - whether successful candidates printed, published or distributed any matter or thing likely to mislead or deceive electors in relation to casting of votes - motion to strike out petition - whether petition defective for want of particularity of facts - whether petition may be amended. Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) s 355 Constitutional Convention (Election) Act 1997 (Cth) ss 35, 52, 126(1), 140, 147, 150, 157(3), 160, 165(1) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 28 Evans v Crichton-Browne (1981) 147 CLR 169, foll Hudson v Lee (1993) 177 CLR 627, refd Nile v Wood (1987) 76 ALR 91, foll Sykes v Australian Electoral Commission (1993) 115 ALR 645, appl Webster v Deahm (1993) 116 ALR 223, appl TONY WILTSHIRE v MALCOLM TURNBULL & ORS NG 5 of 1998 JUDGE: DAVIES J DATE: 16 JANUARY 1998 PLACE: SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 5 of 1998
BETWEEN: TONY WILTSHIRE
PETITIONER
AND: MALCOLM TURNBULL
first Respondent
doug sutherland
second respondent
australian electoral commission
third respondent
commonwealth of australia
fourth respondent
coram: DAVIES J
DATE OF ORDER: 16 JANUARY 1998
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
MINUTES OF ORDER
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The petition be dismissed.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 5 of 1998
BETWEEN: TONY WILTSHIRE
PETITIONER
AND: MALCOLM TURNBULL
first Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate