Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA COSTS - application for summary judgment - second respondents' motion dismissed - whether costs should be in the cause - whether order should be made for payment of costs. JOSEPH COCI, HELEN JOY COCI, ERNEST RAMPELLINI, JENNIFER ANNE RAMPELLINI v NILANT & ORS WAG 7064 of 1997 R D NICHOLSON J 20 FEBRUARY 1998 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAG 7064 of 1997
BETWEEN: JOSEPH COCi, helen joy coci, ernest RAMPELLINI, jennifer anne rampellinI
Applicants
AND: CHARLES PHILIPPE LOUIS NILANT
First Respondent
TERENCE CORNELIUS McMANUS
ROBERT HENRI DeBUF
PATRICIA ANNE DeBUF
REGINALD SARSFIELD FINN
ELIZABETH ROSE FINN,
DONALD GEORGE LYSTER
LEONIE LYSTER
JOHN SELSMARK
ROBERT LLOYD RICHARD-COOMBES
IDA ELEANOR RICHARD-COOMBES
MICHAEL CYRIL HALPIN
GEORGE hugh margetts
gwendoline mary margetts
toleen nominees pty ltd acn 008 923 911
LAVIN NOMINEES PTY LTD ACN 008 923 920
TUDORCOURT INVESTMENTS PTY LTD ACN 051 683 919
MacDOUGALL PTY LTD ACN 008 674 575
Second Respondents
JUDGE: R D NICHOLSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 20 february 1998
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The second respondents pay the applicants' costs of the motion.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAG 7064 of 1997
BETWEEN: JOSEPH COCi, helen joy coci, ernest RAMPELLINI, jennifer anne rampellini
Applicants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate