Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW ) CUSTOMS TARIFF ) - judicial review of delegate's decision refusing a determination under s 273 of the Customs Act 1901 - whether the section and Item 43 in Schedule 4 of the Customs Tariff Act 1987 confer a discretion - whether the delegate exercised his discretion or decided the applicant was not eligible - judicial review not pedantic or concerned with exactness of expression - construction of s 273 - construction of Item 43 in the context of Schedule 4. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION) WORDS AND PHRASES ) - whether "may" in ss 271 and 273 of the Customs Act conferred a discretion or really imposed an obligation. Customs Act 1901, ss 271, 273 Customs Tariff Act 1987, Sched 4 item 43 Finance Facilities Pty Limited v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia (1971) 127 CLR 106, discussed Mitchell v The Queen (1996) 184 CLR 333, distinguished Trengove v Repatriation Commission (1994) 50 FCR 453, distinguished Webb v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1993) 47 FCR 394, distinguished Nashua Australia Pty Ltd v Channon (1981) 36 ALR 215, followed Murphyores Incorporated Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth of Australia (1976) 136 CLR 1, applied Minister for Industry and Commerce v Tooheys Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 260, followed Tooheys Ltd v Minister for Business and Consumer Affairs (1981) 36 ALR 64, followed Minister for Industry and Commerce v East West Trading Co Pty Ltd (1986) 10 FCR 264, followed
ACI OPERATIONS PTY LTD v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CUSTOMS NG 602 of 1996 Burchett J Sydney 27 February 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 602 of 1996
BETWEEN: ACI OPERATIONS PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CUSTOMS
Respondent
JUDGE: BURCHETT J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate