Federal Court of Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 281 of 1994
BETWEEN: PETER ANTHONY THOMPSON AND ROBYN LESLEY THOMPSON
ApplicantS
AND: ICE CREAMERIES OF AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
First Respondent
DAVID ALAN ATCHISON
Second Respondent
JUDGE(S): LEHANE J
DATE OF ORDER: 11 MARCH 1998
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Judgment for the applicants against the respondents jointly and severally in the sum of $220,775.00. 2. The respondents pay two-thirds of the applicants' costs.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 281 of 1994
BETWEEN: PETER ANTHONY THOMPSON AND ROBYN LESLEY THOMPSON
ApplicantS
AND: ICE CREAMERIES OF AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
First Respondent
DAVID ALAN ATCHISON
Second Respondent
JUDGE(S): LEHANE J
DATE: 11 MARCH 1998
PLACE: SYDNEY
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT For reasons given in my judgment delivered on 11 February 1998 I ordered that there should be judgment for the applicants against each respondent for an amount to be calculated in accordance with principles stated in my reasons for judgment. The amount calculated in accordance with those principles has now been agreed upon, and is $220,775. I did not, when delivering judgment, make any order as to costs. I refrained from doing so because I thought there might be scope for argument about costs and the parties had not at that stage had the opportunity to address any argument to me. The question now before me is what order should be made as to costs.
The respondents submit that I should apportion the order for costs, so that the applicants should be entitled to costs in relation to issues on which they were successful, the respondents being entitled, on the other hand, to an order for costs in their favour in relation to issues on which (in their submission) they succeeded. Alternatively, the respondents submit there should be no order as to costs, reflecting the mixed outcome, as they put it, of the proceeding.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate