Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA BANKRUPTCY - voidable disposition - recovery in specie - whether trustee in bankruptcy must elect to avoid disposition before property is sold by the disponee to a third party CONTRACT - implied contract EVIDENCE - documents - whether a trust is a 'business' for the purposes of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) - whether a trust balance sheet is admissible under s 69 of the Evidence Act - whether an annual report is admissible under s 1305 of the Corporations Law SALE OF LAND - Torrens title - indefeasibility of title - whether a volunteer obtains an indefeasible title - bad and doubtful title -time when vendor must show a good title - whether good title must be shown when possession is to be given - whether doubtful title prevents an action at law - when court will not determine the validity of a title TRUSTS - determination of a trust - determination when consideration fails - surrender of a beneficial interest - statute of frauds - surrender must be in writing - part performance TRESPASS - whether proper plaintiff is person entitled to possession Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 120, 121 Corporations Law s 1305 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 69 Property Law Act 1958 (Vic) ss 49(2), 53, 54, 55 Transfer of Land Act (Vic) 1958 ss 42, 43
Alexander v Mills (1870) 6 Ch App 124 mentioned Avondale Printers & Stationers Ltd v Haggie [1979] 2 NZLR 124 discussed Baker & Ors v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (unreported, Full Court, Federal Court, 3 August 1995) applied Bain v Fothergill (1874) 7HL 158 mentioned Bell v Scott (1921) 21 SR(NSW) 706 mentioned Bell v Scott (1922) 30 CLR 387 mentioned Biggs v McEllister (1880) 14 SALR 86 mentioned Bogdanovic v Koteff (1988) 12 NSWLR 472 not followed Boyman v Gutch (1831) 131 ER 147 mentioned Brady v Stapleton (1952) 88 CLR 322 applied Brickles v Snell [1916] 2 AC 599 mentioned Calverley v Green (1984) 155 CLR 242 mentioned Chang v The Registrar of Titles (1976) 137 CLR 177 mentioned Charles Marshall Pty Ltd v Grinsley (1956) 95 CLR 353 mentioned Cooper v Denne (1792) 34 ER 754 applied Crichton v Crichton (1930) 43 CLR 536 considered Crow v Campbell (1884) 10 VLR (E) 186 mentioned Dowling v Moore (1908) 9 SR(NSW) 31 followed Duke Group Ltd(in liq) v Pilmer & Ors (Unreported, Supreme Court of South Australia, 4 November 1994, Mullighan J) followed Dyer v Dyer (1788) 30 ER 42 mentioned Facey & Ors v Rawsthorne & Anor (1925) 35 CLR 566 mentioned Forrer v Nash (1865) 55 ER 858 discussed Frazer v Walker [1967] 1 AC 569 discussed Gollin & Company Ltd v Karenlee Nominees Pty Ltd (1983) 153 CLR 455 distinguished Halkett v Earl of Dudley [1907] 1 Ch 590 discussed Harold Elliott and H Elliott (Builders) Ltd v Pierson [1948] Ch 452 discussed Haynes v Hirst (1927) 27 SR(NSW) 480 mentioned Hutchinson & Anor v Ross (1933) 262 NY 381 applied IAC (Finance) Pty Ltd v Courtenay (1962-1963) 110 CLR 550 mentioned In re Brown; Gordon v Rosenberg (1967) 11 CBR(NS) 17 applied In re Roe and Eddie's Contract [1933] VLR 427 mentioned In re Scott and Alvarez's Contract [1895] 2 Ch 603 followed In re the Land Tax Act; Ex parte Finlay (1884) 10 VLR (E) 68 mentioned Johnson v Clarke [1928] Ch 847 mentioned Kadissi v Jankovic [1987] VR 255 mentioned King v Smail [1958] VR 272 followed KLDE Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties(Qld) (1984) 155 CLR 288 mentioned Lysaght v Edwards [1876] 2 ChD 499 mentioned McDonald v Marson (1913) 33 NZLR 248 followed Manning v Turner [1957] 1 WLR 91 mentioned Mather and Deegan v Morgan [1971] Tas SR 192 mentioned MEPC Ltd v Christian-Edwards & Ors [1981] AC 205 considered Miller v Kavanagh [1932] VLR 391 mentioned Mitchell v Colgan [1922] VLR 372 mentioned Moss v Perpetual Trustees & Agency Co of New Zealand Ltd [1923] NZLR 264 mentioned Mullings v Trinder (1870) 10 Eq 449 discussed Napier v Public Trustee (Western Australia) (1980) 32 ALR 153 mentioned Nottingham Patent Brick and Tile Co v Butler (1886) 16 QBD 778 applied Pearce v Stevens & Ors (1904) 24 NZLR 357 followed Pips (Leisure Productions) Ltd v Walton [1980] 43 P&CR 415 approved Procter v Hugh [1921] 2 Ch 256 mentioned Pyramid Building Society (in liq) v Scorpion Hotels Pty Ltd [1998] 1 VR 188 mentioned Pyrke v Waddingham (1852) 68 ER 813 followed Rasmussen v Rasmussen [1995] 1 VR 613 followed Re Marra Developments Ltd & the Companies Act [1979] 2 NSWLR 193 followed Residues Treatment and Trading Company Ltd & Anor v Southern Resources Ltd & Ors (1989) 7 ACLC 608 not followed Rose v Rose (1986) 7 NSWLR 679 explained Saunders v Vautier (1841) 49 ER 282 mentioned Smith v Colbourne (1914) 2 Ch 533 discussed Tilley v Thomas [1867] 3 Ch App 61 mentioned Toohey v Gunther (1928) 41 CLR 181 discussed Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd & Anor v Ken Morgan Motors Pty Ltd & Ors (1994) 2 VR 106 esp at 178-179 mentioned Trade Practices Commission v TNT Management Pty Ltd (1984) 56 ALR 647 followed Van Reesema v Flavel (1989) 7 ACLC 972 on appeal 7 ACSR 225 mentioned Walker v Public Trustee [1938] 38 SR(NSW) 662 mentioned Wallis v Hands [1893] 2 Ch 75 followed Wilson & Anor v Thomas [1958] 1 WLR 422 considered Ziel Nominees Pty Ltd v VACC Insurance Co Ltd (1975) 180 CLR 173 applied Zsadony v Pizer [1955] VLR 496 mentioned VALOUTIN PTY LTD and PAUL HENRY HARPUR v DEBORAH LEA FURST, STANLEY TREMBACK and THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY (AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF ABRAHAM GOLDBERG) VG 523 of 1993 FINKELSTEIN J MELBOURNE 6 APRIL 1998
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate