Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA MIGRATION LAW - application for judicial review - decision of Minister to refuse a senior executive visa to family with child with mild intellectual disability - whether Court has jurisdiction to review the decision of Minister - whether opinion of Commonwealth Medical Officer is judicially reviewable decision - whether Commonwealth Medical Officer can be made a party to the proceedings for the purpose of judicial review - whether decision of Commonwealth Medical Officer can be reviewed in proceedings brought against the Minister - error of law within the meaning of subs 476(1)(e) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - whether "long term income support" is within the meaning of "health care or community services" in Sch 4 subpar 4005(c)(i) Migration Regulations - whether no evidence to justify making the decision. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - subs 31(3), subs 475(1)(a), subs 475(1)(b), subs 475(1)(c), subs 475(2), s 476, subs 476(1)(e), subs 476(1)(g), subs 476(4)(a), s 480, s 485, subs 485(1) Migration Regulations - regs 2.03, 2.25B; subregs 2.25A(1), 2.25A(3); Sch 2 pars 128, 128.32; Sch 4 pars 4005, 4005(c), subpars 4005(c)(i), 4005(c)(ii); Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Manokian v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (Davies J, 3 December 1997, unreported) Curragh Queensland Mining Ltd v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212 NORMAN SELIGMAN -v- MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS NG 588 of 1997
FOSTER J 9 APril 1998 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 588 of 1997
BETWEEN: norman seligman
Applicant
AND: minister for immigration and multicultural affairs
Respondent
JUDGE: FOSTER J
DATE OF ORDER: 9 APril 1998
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate