Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BANKRUPTCY - bankruptcy notice - application for extension of time for compliance - application filed one day after act of bankruptcy - whether power to extend time under ss 41(5), 41(7), 41(6A) or 33(1)(c) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) - s 41(6A) when application filed after the expiration of time fixed for compliance with the requirements of the bankruptcy notice - whether amount claimed in notice was an overstatement - mortgagee in possession of land - claim for overstatement for failure to account for agistment income and occupation rent during possession, failure to credit at the proper time the proceeds of the sale conversion of chattels - mismanagement of property - Counter‑claim, set‑off or cross demand equal to, or exceeding the debt claimed under s 41(7) - requirements for establishing - need to establish a prima facie case - whether bankruptcy notice defective because of an overstatement of the amount of interest - calculation of interest in a leap year - whether notice irregular on its fact because an understatement of the amount of interest claimed - whether notice defective because misleading and unclear what amount to be paid - use of the words "and not more" to define debt.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth): s 33(1)(c), s 41(5), s 41(6A), s 41(6C), s 41(7)
Ebert v The Union Trustee Company of Australia Limited (1960) 104 CLR 346- followed and applied Re Brink; Ex parte Commercial Banking Co of Sydney Ltd (1980) 30 ALR 433 - followed Re Clubb; Ex parte Clubb v Westpac Banking Corporation (1990) 93 ALR 123 - distinguished Re The Bankruptcy Act 1966; Ex parte Commercial Banking Co of Sydney Ltd (1979) 23 ALR 522 - distinguished Kleinwort Benson Australia Limited v Crowl (1988) 165 CLR 71 - applied Re Farrugia; Ex parte Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (NSW) (1988) 80 ALR 651 - followed Re Hanby; Ex parte Flemington Central Spares Pty Ltd (1967) 10 FLR 378 - followed Re Vella; Ex parte Seymour (1983) 67 FLR 287 - followed Livestock Traders International Pty Ltd v Bui (1996) 22 ACSR 51 - considered Graywinter Properties Pty Ltd v Dyer (1997) 15 ACLC 302 - considered Re Sterling; Ex parte Esanda Ltd (1980) 44 FLR 125 - followed Streimer v Tamas (1981) 54 FLR 253 - followed Re Wilhelmsen; Ex parte Gould (1986) 11 FCR 107 - followed RE: SHADDOCK; EX PARTE COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA VG 7800 of 1997 GOLDBERG J MELBOURNE 9 APRIL 1998
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate