Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
PRACTICE and PROCEDURE - application to strike out part of amended defence and cross-claim
Consolidated Trust v Naylor (1936) 55 CLR 423 Refd Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Ltd v Hogg (1995) 64 SASR 450 Refd International Leasing Corporation Ltd v Aiken (1967) 2 NSWR 427 Refd
Dew & associates Pty limited and barry ernest dew v ANGUS & ROBERTSON BOOKWORLD Pty Ltd
No QG77 of 1996
KIEFEL j
BRISBANE
22 April 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QG77 of 1996
BETWEEN: DEW & ASSOCIATES PTY LIMITED
First Applicant
BARRY ERNEST DEW
Second Applicant
AND: ANGUS & ROBERTSON BOOKWORLD PTY LTD
Respondent
ANGUS & ROBERTSON BOOKWORLD PTY LTD
cross-claimant
DEW & ASSOCIATES PTY LIMITED
first cross- Respondent
BARRY ERNEST DEW
second cross- Respondent
JUDGE: KIEFEL J
DATE OF ORDER: 22 APRIL 1998
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The applicants' application be dismissed. 2. The respondent have leave to amend par 4 in the respects mentioned in the reasons. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QG77 of 1996
BETWEEN: DEW & ASSOCIATES PTY LIMITED
First Applicant
BARRY ERNEST DEW
Second Applicant
AND: ANGUS & ROBERTSON BOOKWORLD PTY LTD
Respondent
ANGUS & ROBERTSON BOOKWORLD PTY LTD
cross-claimant
DEW & ASSOCIATES PTY LIMITED
first cross- Respondent
BARRY ERNEST DEW
second cross- Respondent
JUDGE: KIEFEL J
DATE: 22 APRIL 1998
PLACE: BRISBANE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate