Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
INCOME TAXATION - Failure to lodge taxation return disclosing relevant trust income - decision of Commissioner that assessments should issue for rental income and for additional tax for non-disclosure of income - objections to assessments rejected - decision to reject objections affirmed by Administrative Appeals Tribunal - where Tribunal reached decision on basis that taxpayer had not satisfied onus of proof and demonstrated assessments excessive - where Tribunal placed heavy emphasis on onus of proof and unreliability of witnesses for taxpayer - whether decision of Tribunal invalid because of error of law - whether decision of Tribunal invalid because a decision to which no reasonable decision-maker could have come - whether Tribunal required to be positively satisfied of the liability of the taxpayer before affirming assessments - whether failure by Tribunal to provide procedural fairness. Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 99A Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) s 14ZZK Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223, dist Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67, dist Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Richard Walter Pty Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 168, appl Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Marbray Nominees Pty Ltd (1985) 85 ATC 4750, dist Krew v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1971) 71 ATC 4213, dist Waterford v Commonwealth (1987) 163 CLR 54, refd TRUSTEE OF THE BALMAIN TRUST v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION NG 335 of 1997 DAVIES J 29 APRIL 1998 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 335 of 1997
on appeal FROM THE
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: THE TRUSTEE OF THE BALMAIN TRUST
Applicant
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate