Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – discovery – Commissioner of Taxation - application for discovery of material before the decision maker at the time the determination was made by the Commissioner of Taxation – "fishing" Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia v CanWest Global Communications Corporation (30 June 1997, unreported) – followed Caltex Refining Co Pty Limited v The Amalgamated Metal Workers Union (6 December 1990, unreported) – cited WA Pines Pty Limited v Bannerman (1980) 41 FLR 175 - cited
SAN REMO MACARONI COMPANY PTY LTD V THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
NG 27 of 1998
HILL J
SYDNEY
1 JUNE 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 27 of 1998
BETWEEN: san remo macaroni company pty ltd
(acn 007 543 544)
Applicant
AND: the commissioner of taxation of the commonwealth of australia
Respondent
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE OF ORDER: 1 JUNE 1998
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The Respondent Commissioner on or before 13 July 1998 give discovery of all documents which were before the decision maker at the time of making the determination dated 19 December 1995, including any documents which were before the officer who prepared the report dated 27 October 1995 addressed to Mr Ian Cooper, Regional Coordinator, entitled "A report recommending that determinations under Division 13 of the Income Tax Assessment Act (1936) (sub section 136 AD(3)) be made in respect of the acquisition of pasta products by San Remo Macaroni Co Pty Limited (SRM) from a Swiss company 'Bigalle SA' " or other documents available to that officer in the course of preparing that report. "Documents" in this order means all documents whatsoever and, without limitation, includes correspondence, letters, memoranda, written communications, diary notes, reports, working papers, file notes, minutes, statements, invoices and also includes computer discs, computer tapes and any other form of electronic storage of information. 2. The applicant file and serve any affidavits upon which it proposes to rely on or before 22 June 1998. 3. The respondent file and serve any affidavits upon which it proposes to rely on or before 13 July 1998. 4. The matter be stood over until Wednesday 5 August 1998 at 9.30 am. 5. Any motions, which should only be filed after consultation between counsel, should be directed either at the Duty Judge or such other Judge as the Executive Assistant to the Chief Justice, Ms Carlsund, may nominate. 6. Costs be costs of the cause.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate