Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA IMMIGRATION LAW – Migration Act1958 (Cth) - review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – applicant held to have no well-founded fear of persecution – Tribunal went on to consider issue of internal relocation –– whether reasons of Tribunal clear – whether Tribunal erred in placing weight on findings about past events. Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 475, 476 Randhawa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 52 FCR 437, cited R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal; Ex Parte Jonah [1985] Imm AR 7, cited Politis v Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 16 ALD 707, applied Muralidharan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 62 FCR 402, applied Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259, cited Chahal v The United Kingdom (1996) 23 EHRR 413, considered Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 144 ALR 567, cited Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379, cited
RANJIT SINGH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS NG 29 of 1998 BRANSON J SYDNEY 9 JUNE 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 29 of 1998
BETWEEN: RANJIT SINGH
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE(S): BRANSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 9 JUNE 1998
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal be affirmed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 29 of 1998
BETWEEN: RANJIT SINGH
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate