Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA INDUSTRIAL LAW - termination of employment - prohibited reason - review of Judicial Registrar awards - compensation in lieu of notice - calculated by reference to ordinary hours - meaning of "ordinary hours" - penalty - maximum penalty - criteria for imposition - whether payable to employee - compensation for breach of Act - mitigation of loss - evidence as to contingent factors to reduce compensation.
Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s 170CP, s 170CN(4), s 170CM, s 170CK, s 170CR s 356(b) Kezich v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (1974) 131 CLR 362, cited R v McMahon (1978) 19 ALR 448, cited Veen v R [No 2] (1988) 164 CLR 465, applied ANDREW JAMES FOX v ST BARBARA MINES LIMITED WAG 9 of 1998 FRENCH J PERTH 4 JUNE 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN DISTRICT REGISTRY WAG 9 of 1998
B E T W E E N: ANDREW J FOX
APPLICANT
AND ST BARBARA MINES
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: FRENCH J
DATE OF ORDER: 4 JUNE 1998
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The respondent pay to the applicant within fourteen days the sums of: (a) $4,785 pursuant to s 170CR(4) as compensation for the breach by the respondent of s 170CM of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth). (b) $28,000 pursuant to s 170CR(1) as compensation for the breach by the respondent of s 170CK; and (c) $9,000 pursuant to s 170CR(1) and s 356(b) as a penalty for the breach by the respondent of s 170CK. 2. That the respondent pay the applicant's costs of the application before the Judicial Registrar and the costs of this application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN DISTRICT REGISTRY WAG 9 of 1998
BETWEEN: ANDREW J FOX
APPLICANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate