Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BANKRUPTCY ‑ Sequestration order ‑ Judgment debt ‑ Power of court to go behind judgment ‑ Debt based on guarantee by married woman ‑ Whether defence to debt based on unconscionable conduct by creditor or on principle in Yerkey v Jones
GUARANTEE ‑ Guarantor under disability ‑ Whether lender knew or ought to have known of disability ‑ Unconscionability ‑ Equitable presumption of an invalidating tendency ‑ Credit extended to company of which wife a director and shareholder ‑ Whether presumption applies ‑ Whether presumption part of Australian law.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 s 52
Yerkey v Jones (1939) 63 CLR 649 Warburton v Whiteley (1989) NSW Conv R 55‑453 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v McGee (1994) ASC 56‑278 European Asian of Australia Ltd v Kurland(1985) 8 NSWLR 192 Akins v National Australia Bank (1994) ASC 56‑279 Dowling v Dalgety Australia Ltd (1992) 34 FCR 109 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 National Australia Bank Ltd v Garcia (1997) ANZ Conv R 34 Teachers Health Investments Pty Ltd v Wynne (1997) ANZ Conv R 40 Gregg v Tasmanian Trustees Ltd (1997) 73 FCR 91 Bank of Victoria Ltd v Mueller [1925] VLR 642 Howes v Bishop [1909] 2 KB 390 Talbot v Von Boris (1910) 27 TLR 95; [1911] 1 KB 854 Cain v White (1933) 48 CLR 639 JOYCE RUBY MILES v THE SHELL COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA (ACN 004 610 459) VG 7674 OF 1997 SUNDBERG J 9 JUNE 1998 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 7674 of 1997
BETWEEN: JOYCE RUBY MILES
Applicant
AND: THE SHELL COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA (ACN 004 610 459)
Respondent
JUDGE: SUNDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 9 JUNE 1998
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The respondent's costs of and incidental to the application be taxed and paid in accordance with s 109 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 out of the estate of the applicant, with the same priority as if a sequestration order had been made on the hearing of this application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate