Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Anti-dumping provisions - Decisions of Anti-Dumping Authority and Minister against imposition of dumping duties - Whether decisions invalid in law - Decisions made after second report of Anti-Dumping Authority updating an earlier report that contained an erroneous finding - Failure of Authority to take account of most recent information regarding shipments - Whether this failure could have materially affected decision - Effect of failure to reconsider other issues - Whether decision invalid for unreasonableness. Customs Act 1901, Part XVB
ORICA LIMITED, AUSEON LIMITED and AUSTRALIAN VINYLS CORPORATION LTD
v THE ANTI-DUMPING AUTHORITY and THE MINISTER FOR CUSTOMS AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS
NG710 of 1997
judge: wilcox j
place: sydney
date: 10 june 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG710 of 1997
BETWEEN: ORICA LIMITED
First Applicant
AUSEON LIMITED
Second Applicant
AUSTRALIAN VINYLS CORPORATION LTD
Third Applicant
AND: THE ANTI-DUMPING AUTHORITY
First Respondent
THE MINISTER FOR CUSTOMS AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS
Second Respondent
JUDGE WILCOX J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 JUNE 1998
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for review be dismissed. 2. The applicants pay the respondents' costs of the proceeding. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG710 of 1997
BETWEEN: ORICA LIMITED
First Applicant
AUSEON LIMITED
Second Applicant
AUSTRALIAN VINYLS CORPORATION LTD
Third Applicant
AND: THE ANTI-DUMPING AUTHORITY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate