Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for leave to appeal from interlocutory order dismissing motion for security for costs - representative proceeding under Part IVA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 - all group members natural persons - impecunious representative party - relevance of "nominal plaintiff" ground for ordering security to representative proceedings under Part IVA - whether order for security would be inconsistent with prohibition in s 43(1A) of Act against making of order that group members, other than representative party, pay costs - test for granting leave to appeal against interlocutory order - whether order of dismissal attended by sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration at appellate level. Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 Part IVA, ss 33ZG, 43(1A), 56 Federal Court Rules O28 r3(1)(b) Ramsey v Hartley [1977] 2 All ER 673, referred to Bell Wholesale Company Ltd v Gates Export Corporation, (1984) 2 FCR 1 (FC), referred to Woodhouse v McPhee, unreported, FCA/Merkel J, 24 December 1997, discussed Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397, applied Trade Practices Commission v Rank Commercial Ltd (1994) 53 FCR 303, referred toHouse v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499, applied Barton v Minister for Foreign Affairs (1984) 2 FCR 463 (Morling J), referred toCunningham v Olliver, unreported, FCA/Burchett J, 21 November 1994, referred to GRANT RYAN and OTHERS v GREAT LAKES COUNCIL and OTHERS
ng 183 of 1997
lindgren j
sydney
11 june 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 183 of 1997
BETWEEN: GRANT RYAN
First Applicant
SCOTT CALLAGHAN
Second Applicant
KEVIN GOWER
Third Applicant
DAVID HOLNESS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate