Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA INDUSTRIAL LAW - Alleged breach of industrial award - Provision allowing access to employer's notice boards for display of notices in relation to union's affairs - Employer entitled to remove any "offensive notice" - Circular critical of rival unregistered union and people supporting it removed by employer - Whether award provision rendered unenforceable by s 127AA of Workplace Relations Act - Whether circular was an "offensive notice" - Entitlement of employer to remove - Penalty.
Workplace Relations Act 1996, ss 127AA, 178 and 356
COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC, ENERGY, INFORMATION, POSTAL, PLUMBING AND ALLIED SERVICES UNION OF AUSTRALIA
v AUSTRALIAN POSTAL CORPORATION
NG245 OF 1998
JUDGE: WILCOX J
PLACE: SYDNEY
DATE: 12 JUNE 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG245 of 1998
BETWEEN: COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC, ENERGY, INFORMATION, POSTAL, PLUMBING AND ALLIED SERVICES UNION OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN POSTAL CORPORATION
Respondent
JUDGE WILCOX J
DATE OF ORDER: 12 june 1998
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Within 28 days the respondent, Australian Postal Corporation, pay to the Registrar a penalty pursuant to s 178 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 in the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000). 2. The Registrar pay one half of the said penalty to the Consolidated Revenue Fund and pay the remainder to the applicant, Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG245 of 1998
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate