Federal Court of Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QX 154 of 1996
RE: ALAN BRADLEY JORGENSEN
EX PARTE: MADGWICKS
Applicant
AND: ALAN BRADLEY JORGENSEN
Respondent
JUDGE: SPENDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 JUNE 1998
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. There be no order as to costs against Custom Credit Corporation Ltd. 2. The applicant pay two-thirds of the costs of the respondent, including reserved costs, to be taxed if not agreed.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QX 154 of 1996
rE: ALAN BRADLEY JORGENSEN
ex parte: MADGWICKS
Applicant
AND: ALAN BRADLEY JORGENSEN
Respondent
JUDGE: SPENDER J
DATE: 10 JUNE 1998
PLACE: BRISBANE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT On 29 April 1998 I dismissed an application by Madgwicks and Custom Credit Corporation Ltd to have a composition set aside. Custom Credit Corporation Ltd was joined as a second applicant on the second day of the hearing in order to meet a challenge to the standing of Madgwicks as a creditor to bring the application. On 29 April, I indicated my provisional view that having regard to a number of matters, particularly the failure by Mr Jorgensen on the question of standing, I proposed to order Madgwicks pay half of Mr Jorgensen's costs. I invited written submissions on the question of costs, which have been received. I have had regard to those submissions. I do not accept that had Madgwicks been aware earlier of affidavit material from a number of creditors, they might not have persisted in their application. The ordinary rule is that costs follow the event, although the court has a discretion to make an alternative order. I think that the question of the debtor/creditor relationship between the respondent and Madgwicks was a significant part of the application, and Mr Jorgensen's failure in that regard ought to be recognised by making other than the ordinary order. On reflection, however, my initial view of a 50 percent reduction is too generous to the applicant Madgwicks. I make no order as to costs against Custom Credit, and order that Madgwicks pay two-thirds of the costs of the respondent, including reserved costs, those costs to be taxed if not agreed. I certify that this and the preceding page are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Spender.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate