Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA CATCHWORDS NEGLIGENCE - medical negligence - asthmatic child suffers brain damage after use of suppository prescribed by general practitioner - whether theophylline contained in suppository caused brain damage - whether trial judge entitled to reject strong views of paediatric pharmacologist based on reports of limited laboratory tests performed on other children - whether trial judge entitled to prefer contrary medical evidence based on clinical experience and reading of medical literature - advantage of trial judge in assessing witnesses - appeal court should acknowledge such advantage - question of fact - no error shown. NEGLIGENCE - medical negligence - conflicting evidence as to practice by general medical practitioners at relevant time - trial judge required to choose - advantage of trial judge in assessing witnesses - question of fact - no error shown. NEGLIGENCE - medical negligence - asthmatic child suffers brain damage after use of phenobarbitone prescribed by locum to combat effects of prior use of suppository – whether phenobarbitone caused damage - question of fact - no error shown. NEGLIGENCE – manufacturer's liability – drug contained in suppository – lack of warning as to possible consequences on packaging – doctor prescribing would not have read packaging anyway – causation not established – question of fact – no error shown. DAMAGES – various heads – questions of fact – interest on past component of Griffiths v Kerkemeyer award to await decision of Full Court in another pending appeal – otherwise no error shown. APPEAL – appeal on questions of fact – expert evidence – conflict between opinions of experts – advantage of trial judge – principles applicable. Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1955 (ACT), s 11(4) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52, s 82(2) Adelaide Stevedoring Co Ltd v Frost (1940) 64 CLR 538 at 563 Tubemakers of Australia Ltd v Fernandez (1976) 50 ALJR 720 Griffiths v Kerkemeyer (1977) 139 CLR 161 Van Gervan v Fenton (1992) 175 CLR 327 Hodges v Frost (1984) 53 ALR 373 Arvind v Greco (1995) Aust Torts Reports 81-357 Harris v Briggs (1994) Aust Tort Reports 81-301 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 at 342 Gould v Vaggelas (1984) 58 ALJR 560 Lackersteen v Jones (No.2) (1988) 93 FLR 442 George Wimpey Ltd v BOAC [1955] AC 169 Oceanic Crest Shipping Co v Pilbara Harbour Services Pty Ltd (1995) 160 CLR 626 March v E & M H Stramare Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506 and 507 Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 5 3 1 Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40 Abalos v Australian Postal Commission (1990) 171 CLR 167 Lowns & Another v Woods & Others (1996) Aust Torts Reports 81-376 Koziol vAnasson, a decision of the Full Court of this Court (18 August 1997, unreported) Fitzgerald v Penn (1954) 91 CLR 268 Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc (1993) 113 S Ct 2786 Frye v United States (1923) 293F 1013 Fernandez v Tubemakers of Australia Ltd (1975) 2 NSWLR 190 at 194 Janssen (Cilag) Pty Ltd v Pfizer Pty Limited (1992) ATPR 41-186 Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31 University of Wollongong v Metwally (No. 2) (1985) 59 ALJR 481 at 483 Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658 at 664 Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491 Andjelic v Marsland (1996) 186 CLR 20 Autodesk v Dyason (No 2) (1992-3) 176 CLR 300 Koeck v Persic (ACT Supreme Court, Miles CJ, Gallop and Foster JJ, 26 March 1996, unreported) Cutts v Head [1994] Ch 290 Messiter v Hutchinson (1987) 10 NSWLR 525 at 528 WCW Pty Ltd v Charthill Ltd (Olney J, 7 July 1992, unreported) John S Hayes & Associates Pty Ltd v Kimberley-Clark Australia Pty Ltd (1994) 52 FCR 201 (Hill J) Sanko Steamship Co Ltd v Sumitomo Australia Ltd (Sheppard J, 7 February 1996, unreported) MGICA v Kenny (1996) 140 ALR 707 (Lindgren J) Fasold v Roberts (Sackville J, 11 September 1997, unreported) Multicon Engineering Pty Ltd v Federal Airports Corporation (20 June 1996 unreported) Mutual Community Ltd v Lorden Holdings Pty Ltd (unreported, 28 April 1993) at 12-13 Grincelis v House (AG 59/97)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate