Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA INDUSTRIAL LAW - TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT - whether there was an express termination of employment by the respondent or a resignation by the applicant. - whether the resignation was initiated or resulted from the actions of the employer - whether there is a termination of employment at the initiative of the employer or the employee - whether there has been a contravention of s170CK - whether a proscribed matter formed any part of the reason for the termination of the employment at the initiative of the employer. Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ss 170CK, 170CR. Johns v Gunns Ltd (1995) 60 IR 258 BILL ITALIANO v BETHESDA HOSPITAL VG 0057 of 1998 PARKINSON JR MELBOURNE 19 JUNE 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 0057 of 1998
BETWEEN: BILL ITALIANO
Applicant
AND: BETHESDA HOSPITAL
Respondent
JUDicial PARKINSON
registrar:
DATE OF ORDER: 19 june 1998
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Pursuant to s170CR(1) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) a penalty of $500.00 be imposed upon the respondent; 2. The penalty in Order 1. hereof be paid to the applicant; 3. Pursuant to s170CR(3) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) the respondent pay to the applicant compensation in the sum of $ 3,105.72; 4. Payment of the amounts in Orders 1 and 3 hereof be made within twenty-one days of the date of this order. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 0057 of 1998
BETWEEN: BILL ITALIANO
Applicant
AND: BETHESDA HOSPITAL
Respondent
JUDICIAL REGISTRAR: PARKINSON
DATE: june 1998
PLACE: MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate