Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATIONS - takeover scheme - whether Part A statement defective - whether unpaid capital is part of offeror's "own funds" for the purposes of cl 11(a) of s 750 of the Corporations Law - whether offeror's analysis of the value of the target company's shares is material information for the purposes of cl 17 of s 750 - whether breach of s 698 requires proof of mens rea - meaning of "benefit" in s 698(2) - in what capacity must an offer to a shareholder be made to contravene s 698(2) - whether offer of shares in the offeror constitutes a benefit under s 698(2) - whether an unconditional contract to purchase shares is a benefit under s 698(2) - nature of "defeating condition" in s 662(2) - meaning of "sole control" in s 662(2) - whether parties are associates for the purposes of a particular reference - whether a crossing on SEATS is in the ordinary course of trading on a stock market - meaning of "underwriting" considered WORDS AND PHRASES - meaning of "benefit", "defeating condition" "sole control" and "underwriting" considered Corporations Law ss 34, 662(2), 698(2), 698(5), 750
A.G. (Vic) v Walsh's Holdings Ltd [1973] VR 137 considered and followed in part Albert v Votraint No 320 Pty Ltd (1987) 13 ACLR 336 mentioned Ampolex Ltd v Mobil Exploration & Producing Australia Pty Ltd (1996) 65 FCR 503 mentioned Australian Investment Trust Ltd v Strand & Pitt Street Properties (1931) 31 SR(NSW) 266 on appeal [1932] AC 735 mentioned Boral Energy Resources Ltd v TU Australia (Queensland) Pty Ltd (unreported, Santow J, Supreme Court of New South Wales, 6 May 1998) mentioned Cuming-Smith & Co Ltd v Westralian Farmers Co-operative Ltd (1978) 3 ACLR 906 mentioned Gammon Ltd v AG (Hong Kong) [1985] 1 AC discussed Gantry Acquisition Corp v Parker & Parsley Petroleum Australia Pty Ltd (1994) 51 FCR 554 considered and followed Gjergja v Cooper [1987] VR 167 at 217 applied Green v Crusader Oil NL (1985) 10 ACLR 120 considered He Kaw Teh v R (1985) 157 CLR 523 mentioned ICAL Ltd v County Natwest Securities (Aust) Ltd (1988) 13 ACLR 129 mentioned North Sydney Brick & Tile Co Ltd v Darvall (1986) 5 NSWLR 662 followed Proudman v Dayman (1941) 67 CLR 536 mentioned Re Licensed Victuallers Mutual Trading Association; Ex parte Audain [1889] 42 ChD 1 mentioned Sagasco Amadeus Pty Ltd v Magellan Petroleum Australia Ltd (1992) 9 ACSR 162 on appeal (1993) 177 CLR 508 considered and followed Samic Ltd v Metals Exploration Ltd (1993) 60 SASR 300 on appeal (1994) 181 CLR 109 mentioned Sandell v Porter (1966) 115 CLR 666 mentioned Unity APA v Humes Ltd.(1986) 13 ACLR 501 mentioned ABERFOYLE LIMITED v WESTERN METALS LIMITED VG 3170 of 1998 FINKELSTEIN J 19 JUNE 1998
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate