Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Amendment of defences - Applications to amend defences at time of hearing - Application to amend defence of fourth respondent by withdrawal of admission - whether substance of application is an attempt to re-litigate a matter previously disposed of in an interlocutory proceeding - whether prejudice to applicant if amendment were made - Application to amend defences of all respondents so as to rely on statutory limitations periods - whether right to reliance has been waived - whether prejudice to applicant if amendments were made. Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) - Pts IV, V; ss 82(2), 87 Western Australia v Wardley Australia Limited (1991) 30 FCR 245 - followed. ANN HOPKINS -v- SEYMOUR SOFTWOODS LIMITED & Ors NG 3039 of 1996
FOSTER J 25 FEBRUARY 1998 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 3039 of 1996
BETWEEN: ann hopkins
Applicant
AND: SEYMOUR SOFTWOODS LIMITED (Controller Appointed) (ACN 007 055 889) FIRST RESPONDENT SINTOFF PTY LIMITED (Receiver Appointed) (ACN 006 621 487) SECOND RESPONDENT BERREMA FINANCE PTY LIMITED (Receiver Appointed) (ACN 005 982 605) THIRD RESPONDENT EQUUSCORP PTY LIMITED (formerly called EQUUS FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED) (ACN 006 102 344) FOURTH RESPONDENT EQUUSCORP PTY LIMITED (formerly called EQUUS FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED) (ACN 006 012 344) CROSS-CLAIMANT ANN HOPKINS CROSS-RESPONDENT
JUDGE: FOSTER J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate