Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CORPORATIONS LAW – winding up - whether conduct amounted to oppression, unfair prejudice or unfair discrimination. – family dispute – past practices inconsistent with shareholders' rights – no point of principle. Corporations Law – ss. 260 and 461 PATRICK ANTHONY CASSEGRAIN & ORS v CLAUDE GEORGE RENE CASSEGRAIN & ORS NG 3474 of 1996 DAVIES J SYDNEY 15 JULY 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 3474 of 1996
BETWEEN: PATRICK ANTHONY CASSEGRAIN
First Applicant
CATHERINE BRIGETTE DUNN
Second Applicant
JOHN BAPTISTE CASSEGRAIN
Third Applicant
DENIS PATRICK CASSEGRAIN
Fourth Applicant
AND: CLAUDE GEORGE RENE CASSEGRAIN
First Respondent
ANNE-MARIE cameron
Second Respondent
Claude George Rene Cassegrain and Anne-Marie Cameron as Representatives of the estate of
Françoise GENEVIEVE CASSEGRAIN
Third Respondent
EXPRESSWAY SPARES PTY LIMITED
(ACN 000 483 107)
Fourth Respondent
CASSEGRAIN VINEYARDS PTY LIMITED
(ACN 001 982 289)
Fifth Respondent
CASSEGRAIN TRADITION PTY LIMITED
(ACN 003 578 710)
Sixth Respondent
GERARD CASSEGRAIN & CO PTY LIMITED
(ACN 000 342 174)
Seventh Respondent
CLOS FARMING ESTATES PTY LIMITED
(ACN 003 435 256)
Eighth Respondent
endwise HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED
(ACN 003 894 577)
Ninth Respondent
LE CLOS SANCROX PTY LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate