Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Practice and Procedure - application for leave to appeal from order staying an order for the winding up of a corporation – stay granted pending challenge to order based on the potential constitutional invalidity of the statute in pursuance of which the order was made – challenge brought in separate original proceedings in the High Court, not by appeal in the present litigation – stay granted upon undertaking by respondent to appeal which was not met - whether it was appropriate to grant stay – whether grant of stay undermines the operation of the principles of stare decisis – whether respondent's proceedings amount to a collateral attack on the order for winding up – whether sufficient for stay to show that any process exists to have impugned order set aside – whether fact that order allegedly should have been made by another court alone is sufficient ground for the grant of a stay in circumstances where the trial judge was bound to hold that he had jurisdiction to make the winding up order – whether, given undertaking not met upon which order was premised, the stay order should now be set aside.
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 – s 23, s 25(2)
High Court Rules – O 55
Federal Court Rules - O 37 r 10 Cameron v Cole (1943-1944) 68 CLR 571 – cons. Chicot County Drainage District v Baxter State Bank (1940) 308 US 371 – cons. Construction Employees and Builders Labourers Federation (1981) 34 ALR 208 – cons. FCT v St Helen's Farm (A.C.T.) Pty Ltd (1981) 146 CLR 336 – cons. Federal Commission of Taxation v Meyer (1986) 64 ALR 325 – cons. Gerah Imports v The Duke Group Ltd (in liquidation) (1994) 119 ALR 401 – cons.
IOC Australia Pty Limited v Mobil Oil Australia Limited (1975) 49 ALJR 176 – cons.
Jackson v Sterling Industries Limited (1987) 162 CLR 612 – cons. Jennings Constructions Limited v Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 681 – dist. Rahme v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1993) 68 ALJR 53 – cons. Ravenor Overseas Inc v Readhead (1998) 152 ALR 416 – cons. Re Marks and FIA (1981) 34 ALR 208 – cons. Re Marks and Federated Ironworkers Association; Ex parte Australian Building Reference Re Language Rights under the Manitoba Act 1870 (1985) 19 DLR (4th) 1 – cons. Woods Bros Construction Co v Yankton County, South Dakota 54 F (2d) 304 – cons.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate