Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
INDUSTRIAL LAW – termination of employment – jurisdiction - whether applicant an employee employed by the respondent Workplace Relations and Other Legislation Amendment Act 1996 (No. 60 of 1996) Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth) – s 170ED(1) Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) - ss 170EA, 347
Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 - cited Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Company Proprietary Limited (1986) 160 CLR 16 - considered
Montreal v Montreal Locomotive Works (1947) 1 DLR 161 - cited
Zuijs v Wirth Bros. Pty. Ltd. (1955) 93 CLR 561 - cited Bank Voor Handel en Scheepvaart N.V. v Slatford (1953) 1 QB 248 - cited
SHIRLEY CHRISTINE GRAHAM v DUNNYHIRE (VIC) PTY LTD
VI 2768 of 1996 Judicial Registrar Ryan Melbourne 31 July 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VI 2768 of 1996
BETWEEN: Shirley Christine Graham
Applicant
AND: Dunnyhire (Vic) Pty Ltd
Respondent
JUdicial registrar: RYAN
DATE OF ORDER: 31 JULY 1998
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT:
(1) declares that the applicant was employed by the respondent from 1 July 1995 to 31 October 1996
(2) orders the matter be set down for hearing of submissions on
(a) the second jurisdictional issue of presence or absence of termination at the initiative of the employer (b) the further conduct of the proceeding if the proceeding continues (c) the substantive issue of valid reasons for termination if such are asserted (d) whether the proceeding if continued is by way of further evidence and submissions or by submissions only and reliance on evidence already given.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate