Federal Court of Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SB 699 of 1993
Re: MICHAEL JOHN FULLER
BETWEEN: A Bankrupt
hugh jenner wily as Trustee of the Estate of
michael john fuller
First Applicant
m j fuller services pty limited (in Liquidation)
Second Applicant
AND: laima ann fuller
First Respondent
daiva cecelia fuller and joana maria fuller
Second Respondents
lynn wilkinson and nora wilkinson
Third Respondents
st helier trust company limited
Fourth Respondents
michael john fuller
Fifth Respondent
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE OF ORDER: 31 july 1998
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Leave be given to file an amended statement of claim so far as concerns paragraphs 58 to 58(j) and 63 to 66 of the further amended statement of claim marked Exhibit 1 relating to the second respondents and paragraphs 46 to 46(h) and 51 to 57 so far as they relate to the first respondent. 2. The proceedings reflected in paragraphs 58 to 58(j) and 63 to 66 of the amended statement of claim relating to the second respondents be remitted to the Supreme Court of South Australia. 3. The applicants within 10 days file in this Court and serve upon the second respondents an amended application and statement of claim dealing only with the matters pleaded in paragraphs 58 to 58(j) and 63 to 66. 4. The second respondents file within a further 10 days defences to that statement of claim, it being noted that the Court has been advised that those defences will do no more than raise an issue that no payments were made either to the second respondents or to any person on their behalf or at their direction. 5. Upon the filing of the defence referred to in the last order, the proceedings constituted then by the amended application and statement of claim be remitted to the Supreme Court of South Australia. That the notice of motion for security for costs be stood over until the matter has been remitted in the event that the parties are unable to reach agreement. 6. The second applicant pay the costs of the second respondents in this Court. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate