Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA COSTS – whether Court can make a reduction to account for costs taken up on an issue on which a successful party has failed – whether to award indemnity costs due to conduct of insubstantial claims - impact upon costs of an offer to compromise – whether the conduct of the party to whom offer made is plainly unreasonable – application for orders for costs against non-party in circumstances where security for costs previously ordered Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 45D
Land Act 1962 (Q) ss 343-345 Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association Inc (1986) ATPR 48-134 Appl Queenland Wire Industries Pty Ltd v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd (1987) 17 FCR 211 Appl Australian Conservation Foundation & Ors v Forestry Commission & Ors (1988) 81 ALR 166 Appl Henderson & Ors v Amadio Pty Ltd & Ors (No 3) (Heerey J, Federal Court of Australia, 22 March 1996, unreported) Appl Fasold v Roberts (No 2) (Sackville, Federal Court of Australia, 11 September 1997, unreported) Appl MGICA (1992) Ltd v Kenny & Goode Pty Ltd (No 4) (1996) 70 FCR 236 Appl Colgate-Palmolive Company & Anor v Cussons Pty Limited (1993) 46 FCR 225 Refd Knight v FP Special Assets (1992) 174 CLR 178 Appl JL Holdings Pty Ltd v State of Queensland and Southbank Corporation SG 1 of 1994 Kiefel J Brisbane 25 August 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY SG 1 of 1994
BETWEEN: J L HOLDINGS PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: STATE OF QUEENSLAND
first Respondent
southbank corporation
second respondent
JUDGE: KIEFEL J
DATE OF ORDER: 25 AUGUST 1998
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of the proceedings including reserved costs, save for twenty per cent of the costs on the hearing and twenty per cent of costs of preparation of witnesses and that it pay costs on an indemnity basis of the first respondent's preparation on the claims of civil conspiracy, breach of copyright and of s 45D Trade Practices Act, and defamation and, on the claim of fraud, fifteen days of hearing. 2. The applicant pay the second respondent's costs of the proceedings on an indemnity basis. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate